North African sand trap

In the wake of a trillion-dollar war that gave Iran more say than the United States in Iraq's future, and the longest war in U.S. history in Afghanistan that seems headed for another trillion dollars and is yet to shrink the Taliban insurgency, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates wisely said those who would want to take on a third military operation - against Libya's Col. Moammar Gadhafi - should have their heads examined.

But some hawks are agitating for action against the Libyan pariah, beginning with a no-fly zone (NFZ). That's easier said than done. Col. Gadhafi isn't friendless. For a couple of hundred dollars a month per volunteer, he can get more mercenaries from African states to his south - Niger, Chad and Mali. Arab governments are anti-Gadhafi, but their public opinions still like the cut of his anti-American jib.

In a two-hour live TV peroration broadcast by Al Jazeera in English and in Arabic, Col. Gadhafi excoriated foreign TV news broadcasts like CNN and the BBC. And millions from Yemen to the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Algeria and Morocco thought it was great stuff.

Egypt, heavily dependent on the tourist industry, is already engaged in "de-Mubarak- ization," synonymous with an anti-U.S. campaign. President Mubarak's name was erased from hundreds of schools, hospitals, roads, bridges and military academies. And the deposed president, in power for three decades, is now confined to his residence in Sharm el Sheik while a judicial commission questions him - on the wealth accumulated by him and his family since he succeeded President Sadat, assassinated in 1981.

Lines and allegiances are being redrawn all over the Arab world. This is no time for the United States to get involved in an Arab civil war.

Libya could easily slip into inter-Arab warfare. Nutty though he appeared in his disjointed, two-hour monologue on Al Jazeera, Col. Gadhafi appealed to ignorant masses to join his side against those who are "manipulated by al Qaeda." And the proof he supplied is the U.S. release of Libyans "imprisoned in Guantanamo [Cuba], who made their way back to Libya."

These are the "miscreants," said Col. Gadhafi, who led the attacks that seized control of large segments of Cyrenaica in eastern Libya. U.S. hawks were urging President Obama to line up against Col. Gadhafi's regular forces, which would then quickly cast the United States in the role of anti-Arab villain.

Both the Spanish civil war (1 million killed from 1936 to 1939), which divided both Europe and America between pro-Nazi and pro-Soviet camps, and the 1992-95 Bosnian war that killed about 100,000 civilians and displaced 2.2 million, found the United States on the side of the Muslims. Both are models of how quickly such conflicts can escalate into global crises.

Hence, Mr. Gates' reluctance to get involved. Besides, an NFZ over Libya wouldn't be a matter of a few warplanes flying off an aircraft carrier.

Col. Gadhafi has 227 Russian and French warplanes and batteries of Sam 2 and Sam 6 anti-aircraft missiles. Many of the planes can't fly and those that can could easily be shot down. But it would be a miracle if a U.S. aircraft didn't get shot down by a salvo of missiles, which would quickly escalate the conflict.

The colonel's retaliatory capabilities are not harmless. They would have to be neutralized before a no-fly zone could be initiated.

Moving additional military assets into the region - e.g., to a NATO base in Sicily - would have immediate negative consequences on the war in Afghanistan and cut back on U.S. naval deployment in the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Aden.

The aircraft carrier USS Enterprise and its escort vessels were on their way south through the Suez Canal and the Red Sea to relieve the USS Carl Vinson on station in the Gulf of Aden when they were ordered back to the Mediterranean close to the Libyan coast.

The NFZs over north and south Iraq that lasted from the end of Gulf War I in 1991 through the U.S. invasion in 2003 required 200 military aircraft, 19 naval ships, 22,000 U.S. military personnel. And cost $14 billion. Saudi Arabia picked up the entire tab.

Today, an NFZ over Libya would require assistance from Britain, France and Italy. Britain, under defense cutbacks and Afghan commitments, made clear it could not participate. France and Italy have long cultivated close relations with Col. Gadhafi and are not interested in squeezing him.

An NFZ, said Mr. Gates, begins with an attack on Libya to destroy its air defenses - i.e., an act of war. Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen added an NFZ is "an extraordinarily complex operation to set up." The Senate resolution played it safe; it called on the United Nations Security Council to impose an NFZ over all of Libya." The chances of this being approved ranged from nil to zero.

Meanwhile, Libya is on the edge of a full-blown civil war. And Col. Gadhafi has the wherewithal to reconquer the eastern half of the country. But it will be a long, dragged-out fight.

Libya pumps less than 2 million barrels a day, most of it for Western Europe. Saudi Arabia has signaled it will increase from its current 8.5 million barrels to 10 million or more to keep the global flow even. But speculation is already rife. In Washington, some gas stations are posting $4.55 a gallon.

Arnaud de Borchgrave, editor-at-large of The Washington Times and United Press International.

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *