By Linda Walker, the national co-ordinator of the Chernobyl Children's Project (UK) (THE GUARDIAN, 31/03/06):
Supporters of the nuclear industry will be apoplectic about the report on the Chernobyl legacy by John Vidal (UN accused of ignoring 500,000 deaths, March 25). And even those of us who believe the effects of the nuclear disaster to be widespread, serious and long term, will be disappointed to read of what must surely be a gross over-estimate of the real casualty figures.It is notoriously difficult to gather real statistics - there has been little serious research, and many of those involved have an axe to grind.
The charity I represent has been working in Belarus for 11 years, delivering humanitarian aid, training orphanage staff and foster families, and bringing children to the UK for recuperative holidays.
Regular visitors to Belarus cannot fail to be aware of the many health problems which, even today, seem to be more acute in the contaminated parts of the country. Twenty years on, young parents are giving birth to babies with disabilities or genetic disorders, or who develop serious diseases in their early months. But as far as we know, no research is being conducted into these issues.
Haematologists speak of blood disorders in children which are normally only seen in the elderly; heart disease and respiratory problems in children are widespread; osteoporosis is seen in small children; in the orphanages there are many children who do not grow, still looking like toddlers into their teens; babies are born with missing or twisted limbs; and breast cancer among young women is a major problem.
Thyroid cancer is the only illness which is indisputably linked to Chernobyl. There was a great deal of early scepticism, especially from US scientists, but eventually it could not be denied that the exponential rise in this normally rare disease could have only one cause.
Last September a report by the International Atomic Energy Authority's Chernobyl Forum claimed that, apart from thyroid cancer, there were very few serious health effects in Belarus and Ukraine. Most of the problems were caused by psychological distress or radiophobia, it said. As the IAEA's primary role is the promotion of nuclear power, playing down the effects of the world's worst nuclear disaster is part of its agenda.
On the other hand, if the figures reported by John Vidal were to be believed, 500,000 deaths in Ukraine would mean that at least as many would have died in Belarus, which received a greater proportion of the radiation, with perhaps a further 100,000 in Russia. This would amount to well over a million deaths in the immediate region, not to mention the fatalities across Europe in the path of the fallout. These figures seem almost as unlikely as the derisory "only 51 deaths so far" of the IAEA-led report.
Many charities in Britain have come together to form a coalition - Remember Chernobyl - which seeks to raise maximum awareness about the long-term effects of the fallout, and to appeal for unbiased, independently funded research. Twenty years on, it is time a determined effort was made to learn the truth about the real effects of the disaster.