Who Is Playing Politics With the Port of Piraeus?

“The Battle of Piraeus” in 403 B.C., by 19th century painter, Panagiotis Zografos.CreditCreditHistorical Picture Archive/Corbis, via Getty Images
“The Battle of Piraeus” in 403 B.C., by 19th century painter, Panagiotis Zografos. Credit Historical Picture Archive/Corbis, via Getty Images

Piraeus, the gritty port city that has provided Athens’s naval and commercial power throughout its tumultuous history, is the theater of a new conflict, one that pits local interests against economic development and a superpower’s global strategy. At least that’s the story that Greece’s dueling politicians are telling.

Greek archaeologists have stalled an investment of more than 612 million euros offered by a Chinese-owned company seeking to revamp and expand Piraeus’s port as part of President Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative. Early last month, Greece’s Central Archaeological Council, an advisory body, proposed declaring everything within the limits of the ancient city of Piraeus — most of which overlaps with the modern-day port and commercial center — an archaeological site. This would give archaeologists greater power to monitor construction projects and determine building designs in order to preserve archaeological finds.

For its part, the Piraeus Port Authority, in which China’s state-owned Cosco Shipping holds a 51 percent stake, fears that a designation as an archaeological site could cause serious delays in its project. The Chinese embassy even got involved following the Council’s proposal, seeking assurances that the port development plans will not be derailed.

Both sides are waiting for the culture minister, Myrsini Zorba, to announce whether she has accepted the proposal in full, in part, or not at all. Depending on what happens, Greece could find itself in a diplomatic dispute with its largest foreign investor at a time when the country is in desperate need of foreign investment.

But this story may be more about modern Greece’s political theatrics than about the past getting in the way of the future.

Digging almost anywhere in Greece will turn up traces of the past: from prehistory, the Classical Age, the Hellenistic and Roman eras, Byzantium and the Ottoman Turkish occupation. Construction of Athens’s metro system two decades ago turned into the greatest archaeological excavation the city had seen. This caused delays and added costs, but significant finds were incorporated into stations and important artifacts went to museums, providing the city and its visitors with a richer understanding of the past. Something similar is happening now as Thessaloniki, Greece’s second largest city, builds its own metro system.

Piraeus, a barren peninsula, was established by the Athenians as their major port for trade and warships in the middle of the fifth century B.C. They fortified it and built walls linking it with Athens, just a few miles away. Piraeus’s original design itself is interesting. Credited to Hippodamus, the first known town planner of ancient Greece, it was organized as a grid to reflect the founders’ democratic principles.

It was home to local and foreign-born merchants, as well as to the citizens who manned the warships crucial to Athens’s democracy and empire. Its planning reflected its fortunes. The Macedonian occupation in the fourth century B.C. brought economic decline, while trade during the Roman era saw recovery and the construction of new villas. In 86 B.C., the Romans sacked Athens and Piraeus, and the port was largely abandoned. But since the 19th century, it has once again played a leading role in Greece’s development.

Four of the most magnificent bronze statues that have survived from ancient Greece — most likely buried to hide them from the Romans — were discovered in central Piraeus in 1959 by workers for the local water and sewage company. Since then, construction on metro and tramline extensions has revealed much about the city’s past; archaeologists and construction crews have worked closely to preserve artifacts. In fact, contracts for major projects provide a strict framework, with construction firms paying for excavations.

The Piraeus Port Authority has expressed willingness to respect the past and to conserve antiquities, in accordance with the concession agreement ratified by the Greek Parliament — which includes paying €2.5 million for the ancient walls’ restoration.

So what would be the point in declaring so much of Piraeus an archaeological site? And if this is so important to archaeologists, why wasn’t it done earlier? Culture Ministry officials say that if the Central Archaeological Council’s proposal is accepted, development will not stop. “All we are saying is that under this city lies the ancient city,” one of them told me. But this was never in question.

Greek cities will hold mayoral elections on Sunday. Nikos Belavilas, the candidate in Piraeus from Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras’s left-wing Syriza party, is behind in the polls. Presenting himself as a critic of the Chinese construction project would make him appear a guardian of the city’s past — and would appeal to the left-wing voters, who are skeptical of the Chinese development project. Mr. Belavilas has been careful: He says he supports Chinese investment, but he also welcomed the proposal as “the application of the law.” He told a Greek news site, “When investors do not have the mentality of conquerors or colonialists, everything can be achieved.”

The main opposition party, the center-right New Democracy, on the other hand, attributed the Council’s intervention to the government’s “ideological obsessions,” saying that these “undermine building activity in the country’s largest port.” The incumbent mayor, Yannis Moralis, said that no one knows how applying the proposal would affect life and business in the city.

Mr. Tsipras was in Beijing last month for the Belt and Road Forum, where Piraeus’s port was presented as one of the projects enhancing China’s connection to the global economy. But the prime minister is a convert to this position. When Syriza came to power, in early 2015, it opposed privatization in principle, but Greece’s creditors forced it to adapt, leading to the sale of the majority stake in the port in August 2016. The Chinese company, which has run a container terminal there for nearly 10 years, says its investments have already generated jobs for more than 3,000 people and, indirectly, for another 10,000.

Nearly two months after the council’s proposal, the culture minister is yet to make a decision — conveniently tying the drama around Piraeus’s development to Sunday’s mayoral and European Parliament elections. It allows Syriza to tell its voters that it fights big interests, even as it signs deals with them.

Nikos Konstandaras is a columnist at the Greek newspaper Kathimerini and a contributing opinion writer.

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *